How to use SMEFTatNLO correctly? (4 Fermion contributions)

Asked by Christian

Hello,

I am trying to use the model "SmeftatNLO" from http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/SMEFTatNLO.
My plan is to compare cross section for the top quark pair production with the default sm model and the SMEFT.
A month or two ago, I tried to use the SMEFT, but the cross section was too high, compared to my QCD cross section. Now I have read a paper, which seems to imply that the relevant controbutions to ttbar are the dimension 6 four fermion operators.

I have tried to understand the param Card, it has multiple blocks.

I expect that, in order to have relevant calculations, and be able to do what the paper did, I need to leave following blocks unchanged:
 INFORMATION FOR DIM6
 INFORMATION FOR DIM64f

At the same time, I am unsure if it really is wise to simply put all the other blocks to zero. That is why I wanted to ask, if it makes sense, to only leave these two blocks unchanged, in order to get the values from the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.11743.pdf .

Best regards,

Christian

Some more information just in case it proves useful:

My QCD calculation with the default sm and MSTW2008 at LO was of about 457 pb.

Using the SMEFT and only using the block for dim6 (not even dim6f2 or dim6f4) got me a cross section of about 457 pb too.

Now, using the standard param card, I got a cross section of 539 pb, which seemes far too high to me. From my understanding, the deviations should be very small at 13 TeV.

The imported model was SmeftatNLO-LO, but I have also used SmeftatNLO-NLO for my NLO calcs.

If I can provide any more information, please let me know

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#1

Hi,

I'm not a world expert in SMEFT (which the author of the paper you quote are), but at least at my level of expertise, I would say that it is reasonable to set to zero some sector of the EFT.

For the value "too high", you might want to consider to reduce the value of the EFT coupling in the param_card.dat

Cheers,

Olivier

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Christian for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.